My bookshelf

Shikarindo's bookshelf: read

To Kill a Mockingbird
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
The Da Vinci Code
The Kite Runner
The Catcher in the Rye
The Hobbit
Animal Farm
Angels & Demons
The Alchemist
You Are Here
Catch-22
Love Story
Oliver's Story
Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything


Shikarindo's books »
}

Monday, April 25, 2011

Social Networking: Do's & Don't's

Before I start on this topic, most of the points that I mention here are acquired over a period of time through various sources on the Internet and some personal experiences. Since I don't remember the sources to quote them right now, I am implicitly acknowledging all of them in this blog.

Social networking makes it easy to keep in touch with our friends, but it also blurs the distinction between public and private lifes of an individual. I have seen many people who are not concerned about various privacy issues that could raise because of social networks. Here I discuss some of the privacy issues and various do's and don'ts:

Number one rule is to check your privacy settings. The default settings are NOT good enough for your privacy protection. Default settings are often "Everyone" or "Friends of friends" but you might want to customize it as either "Only me" or "Only friends".

Never crib about your boss or school or lectureres (or anyother third person for that matter) on the networking sites. You might not be a 'friend' to your boss and your privacy settings might only restrict for your friends but your friends might not have a strict control and your comments might be seen by people you dont expect.

Never update invitations to parties as status messages. People who are uninvited might feel bad.You might be developing enemies unknowingly.

Think before tagging. These days many companies are doing their background work on social networking sites to find your personality. Don't upload photos which are not appropriate and don't tag them.

(Esp. If you have a bad past) It is recommended that you have a different name on your social network. Usually many people (in India) would have an alternate name. Use your alternate name for creating social networking sites so that people who know you can easily find you. As a rule, your social networking site should not be google-searchable but your professional network (like LinkedIn) should be google searchable.

These days (not in India) courts are giving judgements based on the social networking updates/comments. So, beware before you do any inappropriate comments. [This is not an exaggeration. It is true]

You might feel good if your friends wish you on your birthday. But birthday is generally used for resetting passwords (of your banks) and similar transactions. So, DONT update your birthday on social networks. Social networks only need to know your age and it is sufficient to reveal only your age.

Never accept friend requests from unknown people. We have seen spamming from this unknown friends in orkut.

Remember that you would have a control on your updates but all your comments are on others pages.You might not remember them so becareful while commenting on others posts.

(In India) don't publicize your private life with your bf/gf.You never know how things are going
to turn out to be.

In computer security, there are mainly two kinds of attacks: Passive & Active. Out of these two, a passive attack is tough to deal with because you don't know who is listening to your traffic and analyzing it. Similary, when you doing an update/comment on your network, everyone of your friends (and your friends of friends) are going to read it. So, be careful about revealing sensitive information. A naive example could be updating your first school, which is often a security question to reset your password.

Reveal as less information as possible on your social network to enable people to find you. No need to add all the schools/colleges/offices that have worked/studied with.

Never update about your travel plans. With the help of google street view, people could easily plan to break into your house sitting in their home. There were cases of such kind of burglary.

On a similar note, avoid location based services as much as possible. You might not want to be tracked about every location you visit.

Never share any kind of passwords even though they might think there is no important information in your account. Your account might have your birthday, security questions and other sensitive information which is enough to crack your e-mail password.

Never send any passwords,credit card information through chat, email or messages. They are not as secure as you think. These messages are sent in clear. If you are using wireless networks, then it becomes very easy to listen to every byte that you sent out of your communicating device.

You might think that you can delete your account if something wrong happens. With this social networks, you never know who is doing a passive attack.

Think twice before allowing access to any apps. There were cases where personal information has been sold by these apps to advertisers. We are already getting lot of spam in our account, don't think that spam is harmless.

It is good if you can read the privacy policy before signing up. Facebook, initially had a copyright policy of owning all the photos that were uploaded in their site. Now, it is changed. But it is always good know the policy.

P.S: This blog is dedicated to a 'private' person.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Do you have a Heart?

Many times, we hear quotes like "When at a conflict between the Mind and the Heart, always follow the Heart". My topic here is to discuss the following things (not in this order):
1) Do we really have something called Heart? May not be in the physical sense of it, but logically?.
2) Why Mind is considered to be bad when compared to Heart?
3) Assuming we have a Heart, should we (always) listen to it (or at all)?

We typically hear something like "My bad! I should have followed my Heart! Now, I am here neither I want to go back nor I am able to continue further". We hear these kind of arguments mainly when people fail after taking a decision. Most of the times, these comments are made in retrospect, and irrespective of the other choice which was neglected they think that it would have been their Heart's choice.

So what exactly is Heart? Heart is loosely dubbed as the thing which instructs about what-we-want-to-do?. Whereas Mind is something which says what-is-practical. Heart's instructions are mainly based on loose ideas which are programmed due to an influence by the various relations we have in our life or baseless emotions. While Mind is practical, it things about all the pros and cons about the situation and takes a right decision. The question of Mind Vs Heart comes up when people are not able to coup with their current situation.

Assuming that there is a child who has lot of interest in Cricket but doesn't have the required talent to go and play it. In this case, should he stupidly make a decision to leave his studies and play Cricket? Heart is foolish and stupid. It doesn't understand what you can do. Most of the times, even when people follow the so-called Heart, they don't understand the consequence of their decisions and consequently regret their own decision. Because if you go in either direction, problems are inevitable. People who can't stand up for these problems, often point out saying that I should have listened to my Heart or my Mind. We don't hear these arguments of Mind Vs Heart from people who are determined and take the responsibility of their actions.

Usually Mind Vs Heart comes up when people are either indecisive or they failed after taking a decision. It may not be a failure but they are not happy about their decisions. Life is all about taking a taking a set of decisions and living up-to your decisions.If you are not able to live about your decisions, then you would start blaming the Heart or the Mind.

Many times people confuse emotions with Heart. When you are angry, if you show anger (unnecessarily) then you are not following your Heart, you are being stupid. You are not able to control your emotions. Mostly in movies (like Upendra's movies) we see this kind of attitude.
[Another blog on emotional decision Vs logical decision]

We hear people saying that "I love you with all my Heart". Heart is only an organ which supplies blood, how can you love with all the Heart and not with liver (like the joke in EVV movies)?. Then what do we mean in this context?. All we mean is "You are occupied in my Mind".

Heart is again loosely connected to social service, kindness etc. And this is mainly because of the social conditioning. [Social conditioning tells us that growing rich is not good, because a rich house wont have love; poor hut has :P. But we do the opposite.]. When it comes to practicality, we realize that we don't have the Heart which is portrayed so beautifully in books/movies. What we do is, we apply our own logic to these situations and act according to them. So, we don't really care about so-called Heart in this situations and many other situations.

In other words, Heart is just a word, usually used for literary purpose but in all existence there is only Mind and you better listen to it. Don't get carried away by an illusionary, emotional, indecisive, social-programmed Heart.Follow your mind.

I have only my Mind and I always listen to it. What about you? Do you have a (logical) Heart?

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Electoral Systems - Is FPTP still useful in India?

I happen to listen to a speech by Dr. Jayaprakash Narayan, in which he termed 'first-pass-the-post-system" (which India follows) as unnatural and is increasingly discouraged by many countries which are switching to other systems like proportional systems and multi member parliament systems.



Because of my total ignorance of electoral systems, I have always thought that FPTP is the only kind of electoral system available. After listening to the speech, I started to do some research on these electoral systems. Surprisingly, there are many other alternatives for this FPTP. Here is the list of the electoral systems used in the world

  Africa Americas Asia CIS & Post-Communist Western Europe Middle East Oceania Total
FPTP 19 (35%) 19 (40%) 10 (45%) 1 (4%) 4 (14%) 3 (30%) 14 (64%) 70
BV 1 (2%) 2 (4%) 5 (23%) 0 0 2 (20%) 0 10
AV 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (9%) 2
TRS 10 (18%) 6 (12%) 1 (5%) 8 (30%) 2 (7%) 2 (20%) 2 (9%) 31
SNTV 0 0 0 0 0 1 (10%) 1 (4%) 2
Parallel 7 (13%) 2 (4%) 3 (15%) 7 (26%) 1 (3%) 0 0 20
List PR 17 (31%) 16 (33%) 3 (15%) 10 (37%) 17 (61%) 2 (20%) 2 (9%) 67
MMP 0 3 (6%) 0 1 (4%) 2 (7%) 0 1 (4%) 7
STV 0 0 0 0 2 (7%) 0 0 2
Total 54 48 22 27 28 10 22 211

(Source)

For starters, First-past-the-post (abbreviated FPTP or FPP) voting is a generic term referring to an election won by the highest polling candidate(s). Simply put, if you get more votes you are the winner.
(Source)

So, the question now is: Is FPTP still relevant and useful in India?
First of all let us look at some of the disadvantages of FPTP:
- Excluding Minority Parties from Fair Representation
- Excluding Minorities from Fair Representation
- This problem is solved in India by using reservations
- Excluding Women from Parliament
- This problem might be solved when the women's reservation bill becomes effective.
-Encouraging the Development of Ethnic Parties
- We are already facing this problem where parties are trying to get votes in the name of caste/religion rather than development
- Exaggerating 'Regional Fiefdoms'
- Even though the elected party doesn't really get the major percentage of the votes they get more number of seats than the other parties. (Refer)
- Leaving a Large Number of 'Wasted Votes'
- This is a major concern in my opinion. I know a lot of people who voted for LokSatta in Andhra Pradesh. It has resulted in splitting the votes away from TDP and indirectly encouraging Congress to win.
- Being Unresponsive to Changes in Public Opinion
- A vote by an individual doesn't really carry any weight unless (s)he votes for one of the two major parties.
- Open to the Manipulation of Electoral Boundaries
- We have such manipulations earlier. But I am not sure if such manipulations are still possible with electronic voting.
(Source)

Now, let us look at the advantages of the FPTP:
- It provides a clear cut choice for voters between two main parties
- Is this still relevant? With the increase in the number of the parties contending the election, FPTP will become ineffective. Parties with 30% of the votes can be elected.
- It benefits broadly-based political parties.
- Which forced BJP to include minorities in their party.
- It excludes extremist parties from parliamentary representation.
- In somecases, it is not really an advantage in my opinion.
- It retains the link between constituents and their Member of Parliament (MP)
- Does it really help? Do our MP/MLA's represent their constituency in true sense OR do they really do any work for their constituencies ?
- It allows voters to choose between people, rather than just between parties.
- Same question as above
- Finally, FPTP systems are particularly praised for being simple to use and understand.
(Source)

Now these are my points for discussion:
- Is FPTP still relevant and useful for India? When all the other countries have moved away or trying to move away from FPTP?

- Which one of the other systems are good for India?
- As Dr. Jayaprakash Narayan said is MMP system good for India?
- As per a report by the National Commission "....the National Commission recommended that the government and the Election Commission of India conduct a careful and full examination of the introduction of a Two-Round system, with the second round conducted between the two leading candidates in each district on the day after the first round....." (source)

- Will a two-round system works in India. Considering the cost of its implementation and the illiteracy of the common man to understand what is a two round system?
- Will the two-round system possibly eliminate the vote-for-money?

- Finally, as a common man what can we do to change the electoral system if some other system seems to be better than FPTP.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Will the corruption end with Jan Lokpal ?

The article here provides a different perspective on the on-going movement against corruption. To summarize, the author points out the following views:
1) The Jan Lokpal bill proposed is anti-democratic.
2) When you have the power to vote, why elect a corrupt politician?
3) Making laws is the right of governments, no matter how ineffective or corrupt these governments may be.
4) Nearly all corruption in India is related to government (I have never met an Indian who has not been forced to bribe an official at some time or other).


While the first three points are debatable, I agree with the last point. While corruption at a higher level, CWG/telecom makes me feel bad, what makes it painful is to pay bribes to get the things done in government offices. This has always bothered me. What is the root cause for this kind of corruption: Is it because of the corrupt politicians? I think no. (Correct me if I am wrong) My personal opinion in this matter is that, because of the socialistic attitude of our government formed after Independence, government tried to provide security to its officials/employees and this is where the corruption started. When these government employees knew that they don't have to work to get their salary or promotion, they stopped working and started taking bribes.

Now the question is: will this Jan Lokpall bill stop this kind of corruption? Earlier, we have seen some new channels doing hungama by exposing some corrupt officials to raise their TRP's but how much effect does it had on these people? Though I don't support politicians being corrupt, politicians have been corrupt in the most developed nations also. Can we really stop politicians not to be corrupt? While corruption in many other countries are at higher level, corruption in India is at all levels. Can we really become corruption free by making this Jan Lokpall bill?

Second: if the government makes laws against corruption for the government employees or if they make all the jobs temporary, will the people accept it? Is it possible to make such a law? Can a government sustain after making such a law?

Third: Take the current situation in Tamil Nadu. Both the parties DMK & AIADMK are competing with each other for offering bribes (TVs, Grinders, cellphones) why don't the people stand up and say we don't want to elect these people who are offering us bribes. We, the people are corrupt. We need bribes. Can a society with this kind of attitude be changed with a simple law?

Friday, April 8, 2011

Do we love to love or do we love to hate ?

Many times in my life I wondered, whether we love to love or we love to hate? Let me explain. For example, you have a bunch of friends, have you ever wondered how only some of them become more close than others. Is it because you have common things that you love or you have common things that you hate? More often than that not, it is the later case. Commonness of hatred is stronger than commonness of love. A group of colleagues sitting in a cafeteria talking with each other find a bond between them more because they hate the boss than because they like each other.

Not convinced? Haven't we seen fans who are supposed to love their star or celebrity actually hate the remaining stars. Forget about following the ideals of their stars/celebrities, what they do all the time is to quarrel with fans of other stars/celebrities. Haven't we seen the fan-wars in different platforms forming groups and fighting with each other. If you have never witnessed such far-wars, check the comments section of articles and videos in sites like YouTube, Cricinfo etc.

Lets not think about the other stars/celebrities, even in the case of our own stars, if they behave a little different than what we expect we hate them. A classic example for this, when Sachin got tax exception on his imported car, the whole nation, including his hard-core fans said "He is such a rich man why does he gets the tax exemption?". Isn't this some kind of hatred?

To quote another example: Consider a situation where India performed competent enough but lost to Pakistan, what do the people do? Is it the love for India or cricket or do we hate Pakistan? In fact, we Indians, do we really love Cricket?

Most political parties purely live in the name of love for a region or caste or religion. But what they actually do is to hate the others. We have seen this hatred in other countries also like Australia and United States, where the outsiders are beaten in the name of love for the country/natives.

Religion. Historically, religion has always preached love but practiced hatred. You become religious only if you hate other religions. Lot of conversions happened by show-casing the hatred to a particular religion. The dose of this kind of hatred is much higher in India because of the variety ways we found to hate each other: language, region, caste and infinite ways. People of one caste or region come together to hate the others. Agitations like Telangana or so-called moral-police are based on pure hatred than pure love. I sometimes feel that these people eat, drink and live hatred but say otherwise.(To digress, Shiva Sena has not said a word against Poonam Pandey till the match is over. They raised their voice after the match is over, which looks like they are more disappointed NOT to see her nude).

Though in all the movies, stories and fairy-tales, we have seen 'Love' as the life of our lives, what we actual do is to Hate in the name of Love. While love is a complicated, idealistic, undefined, controversial, over-hyped emotion, hate is a fairly simple,under-rated bold emotion. While there might be people who have not shown or seen love in their life, there wont be anybody who haven't felt 'Hatred'.To put in a different perspective, hatred if unchecked or ignored plays a bigger role than love. For many people like T-agitators and other similar parties, hatred has become life. What about you? Did you check the level of hatred you feel in your life?

P.S: The background pic is taken by me.